91¶ÌÊÓƵ Foundation recommends to oppose the remuneration reports at the annual general meetings of Credit Suisse (26 April) and UBS (2 May). Despite the progress made by the two banks with regard to the executive remuneration structure, the amounts paid are still too high.
Credit Suisse and UBS have made an in-depth review of their remuneration systems and implemented several amendments. 91¶ÌÊÓƵ notes that Credit Suisse has introduced caps on the variable remuneration in percentage of the base salary. This has been requested with insistence by 91¶ÌÊÓƵ since many years. Credit Suisse is now one of the first banks to introduce such a cap which 91¶ÌÊÓƵ commends, as it is now possible to calculate the maximum potential remuneration of the executive management. For 2013, the maximum variable remuneration of Brady Dougan, the CEO, will be capped at 6 times his base salary (CHF 2.5 Million in 2012), which 91¶ÌÊÓƵ still considers as excessive.
UBS has not gone as far as Credit Suisse, however the bank has introduced a cap on the aggregate amount of the variable remuneration of the members of executive management. This cap is set at 2.5% of the income before tax and value adjustments. Nevertheless, the CEO's 2012 remuneration was approximately CHF 9 million, while the bank posted an accounting loss of CHF 2.5 billion in 2012.
91¶ÌÊÓƵ also notes that in both banks, the chairman's remuneration is excessive, as they receive approximately CHF 5 million (annualised). In light of all these concerns, 91¶ÌÊÓƵ recommends that shareholders oppose the remuneration systems of both Credit Suisse and UBS.
Credit Suisse: 91¶ÌÊÓƵ opposes the conditional capital increase for the employees
Credit Suisse grants shares to its staff corresponding to approx. 4% of its capital per year. Such an amount is quite high and largely exceeds the limits generally accepted by investors. To service employee incentive plans, Credit Suisse wants to issue new shares rather than use repurchased shares. This allows settling remuneration, while at the same time reinforcing the bank's capital base. In light of the dilution which shareholders incurred during the past and the excessive grant of shares, 91¶ÌÊÓƵ recommends to oppose the conditional capital increase request.
UBS: 91¶ÌÊÓƵ refuses the discharge and the re-election of the external auditor
In 2012, the scandal related to the LIBOR manipulation led UBS to pay a record fine of CHF 1.4 billion. 91¶ÌÊÓƵ acknowledges that certain members of the board of directors were not in place at the time of these events. However, as UBS does not propose to discharge board and executive management members individually, 91¶ÌÊÓƵ recommends to oppose the discharge of the board and the executive management.
91¶ÌÊÓƵ also recommends to oppose the re-appointment of Ernst & Young, the company's external auditor since 1997. 91¶ÌÊÓƵ has serious concerns regarding the quality of the audit in the recent past. In particular, the external auditor did not identify any of the recent scandals involving the bank (subprime loans, fiscal fraud, unauthorised trading in London, LIBOR manipulation). Furthermore, the auditor received CHF 122 million in 2012.